top of page

Understanding Parkinson's Law of Triviality: Why Minor Issues Often Get Major Attention

Parkinson's Law of Triviality

In the landscape of organizational behavior, few concepts capture the idiosyncrasies of human decision-making as vividly as Parkinson's Law of Triviality, also known as the "Bike-Shed Effect." Coined by Cyril Northcote Parkinson in 1957 through an observation he shared in his book "Parkinson's Law: The Pursuit of Progress," this principle illuminates a peculiar, yet pervasive, tendency in group dynamics: the disproportionate amount of time spent discussing trivial issues while more significant matters are hastily reviewed and decided upon.

Origins and Explanation of Parkinson's Law of Triviality

Parkinson's Law of Triviality emerges from a humorous yet insightful anecdote involving a fictional committee's plans to approve a nuclear power plant. Parkinson observed that the committee spent an inordinate amount of time deliberating about a relatively minor item—a bike shed—while merely nodding through the far more complex and costly proposal to build the reactor. The reason? The bike shed was a matter simple enough for all members to grasp and opine on, whereas the nuclear reactor, a far more intricate and expensive project, was beyond the technical understanding of many members.

Psychological Underpinnings

The principle is rooted deeply in human psychology. When faced with complex decisions that are hard to understand, people tend to focus on simpler, smaller topics where they feel competent and comfortable. This behavior isn't just about staying in one's comfort zone; it's also about participation. In any group setting, individuals are driven by the need to contribute meaningfully. Discussing simple issues allows for a broader participation, as these are more accessible to everyone, regardless of their expertise.

Implications in Modern Settings

In the modern workplace, Parkinson's Law of Triviality is more relevant than ever. Meetings can often become battlegrounds where trivial matters are debated at length, leaving little time for substantive issues crucial to organizational success. This misallocation of resources can lead to inefficient decision-making and can stifle innovation.

Strategies to Combat Triviality

Organizations and leaders can adopt several strategies to mitigate the effects of this law:

  1. Clear Agendas and Time Limits: Setting a strict agenda with allocated times for discussion can help keep meetings focused on priority items.

  2. Decision-making Authority: Delegating decision-making authority on lesser issues can reduce the time spent on them in larger meetings.

  3. Expert Sessions: For complex topics, having preliminary sessions with experts can prepare non-experts for more informed and concise discussions in larger settings.

  4. Encourage Preparation: Ensuring all participants are prepared with the necessary background information can elevate the quality of discussion and reduce the focus on trivialities.

Parkinson's Law of Triviality serves as a reminder of the quirks in human psychology that can disrupt efficient decision-making. By understanding and anticipating this tendency, leaders can design better decision-making processes that balance the need for thorough discussion with the necessity of not getting bogged down in inconsequential details. In doing so, organizations can ensure that their energies are spent on what truly matters, propelling them towards greater effectiveness and innovation.


bottom of page